Why undocumented immigrants are bad

Speak out publicly against efforts to rescind DACA. Bring their children to school. Guiding principles and policy proposals: Building a fair and humane immigration system that works. While immigrants have always been an essential part of America— In , then-Sen. John F. Kennedy built upon this notion in a book published after his death, also titled A Nation of Immigrants.

See John F. One illustration of this phenomenon occurred last year, when U. During an event hosted by the restrictionist Center for Immigration Studies, then-USCIS Director Francis Cissna defended the change by saying it was necessary to clear up the misimpression that USCIS serves the immigrants with whom it interacts rather than the American people and the laws on the books.

See Francis Cissna and Jessica M. Adams, an author of the original Massachusetts Constitution, had used the phrase earlier in his Novanglus essays. Garner, ed. Paul, MN: West Publishing, , p. Farhana Khera and Johnathan J. Immigration and Customs Enforcement , F. Grace v. Matthew G. Whitaker , F. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump , F. For application for stay denied, see S. Innovation Law Lab v. Kevin McAleenan, brief of amicus curiae Local , U. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, No.

See, for example, Regents of the University of California v. Department of Homeland Security , F. Each of those other cases is currently pending appeal. City of Chicago v. Sessions , F. Department of Justice , No. Ramos v. Nielsen , F. The last major overhaul of the legal immigration system was the Immigration Act of , Public Law , st Cong, 2nd sess. While the Immigration Act of did include a positive preference for agricultural workers, since the s, and the foundations of the current immigration system—namely the Immigration and Nationality Act of and its subsequent amendments in —U.

The bracero program provides a good illustration of the dynamic here: As Alex Nowrasteh of the Cato Institute has pointed out, during the bracero program, nearly 5 million Mexican workers came to the United States to work, and the government did all it could to ensure that workers came legally as part of the program—even, for example, having unauthorized workers step back across the border to instantly return as a legal bracero worker.

But the ending of the program in , and the inability of policymakers to replace it with other workable channels for entry—especially when the demand for these workers had not fallen—led to a sharp increase in unauthorized migration. Even today, the pathways for so-called lesser-skilled immigrants to enter the country are few: The United States gives only 5, permanent visas out to such workers each year, with only the restrictive H-2A program, for seasonal agricultural workers, or H-2B program, for nonagricultural workers, capped at 66, visas per year.

In , Congress legislated that no country would be allotted more than 20, permanent visas in a given year. In , Congress raised that numerical cap to 7 percent of all visas each year.

While ostensibly a way to mandate equality among the nations, in reality the cap has disadvantaged immigrants from populous countries and those that have strong ties to the United States by virtue of proximity or history. In a piece published in at the beginning of the Obama administration, law professors Adam B. The actions taken by the Trump administration over the past 30 months may illustrate that point even more clearly than those taken during the preceding eight years.

Jill H. See, for example, U. See, for example, United States v. Texas , U. See, for example, Donald M. Kerwin Jr. Karthick Ramakrishnan and Pratheepan Gulasekaram argue that anti-immigrant groups such as the Federation for American Immigration Reform and NumbersUSA actively worked to first block positive legislation at the federal level, while also then going to states such as Arizona to pass laws such as the restrictive S.

That is completely false. The Visa Bulletin tells us only how long people who are currently getting visas in any given category have already been waiting in the backlog, but it provides no information about the number of people in the backlog behind them. For that information, it is necessary to consider data maintained by both U.

Citizenship and Immigration Services and the State Department on the number of people now in each queue, as well as the number of visas given out in each category annually to individuals from each country. Although the offset is due to end in the near future, the very fact that visas granted to longtime residents of the country had to be offset by immigrant visas used largely by new immigrants demonstrates the power that restrictionists have long wielded to choke off legal pathways into the country, and shows how they have used that power precisely in the visa categories devoted to so-called lesser-skilled workers and individuals from countries that generally are underrepresented in the U.

This places such workers at a structural disadvantage with respect to other workers when it comes to advocating for better wages and working conditions and generates resentment among U. See generally William A. And doubly cruel, for these individuals, the moment their child—who is a derivative beneficiary of their H-1B visa—turns 21, that child will fall out of status and become undocumented unless they, too, can begin to piece together a series of complicated options to remain as a visitor in the only country they may have ever known.

Plyler v. Doe , U. Importantly, as historian Mae Ngai points out, extralegal workarounds have been used in immigration policy not only to discriminate against immigrants of color, but also to benefit white immigrants.

In the mids, the Immigration and Naturalization Service started a program known as preexamination, which allowed people in the country without status to cross the Canadian border and be readmitted to the U. Dee, Daniel J. Elizabeth F. Cohen also points out that by ignoring the decades of residence in country that undocumented immigrants have accrued, we devalue their time—and, ultimately, them—entirely. Motomura, Immigration Outside the Law , p.

One example of a workaround adopted by the Obama administration to an intractable challenge involved the policy providing consistent guidance regarding the use of parole-in-place for certain undocumented family members of military personnel, veterans, and enlistees.

Under the policy, such family members who originally entered the country without inspection could request to be paroled into the country and—depending on their individual circumstances—might then be able to adjust their status to permanent residence.

The goal of the policy was to alleviate concerns raised by the U. Department of Defense, which had long seen active members of the U. Texas, et al. United States , No. Which of these two starkly different perspectives on the lives of the estimated 6 million to 9 million illegal immigrants now living in the U. Almost certainly the second. Yet in the weeks and months ahead, it is the first that will be emphasized as some promote amnesty to the American public as the key to bringing order to our immigration policy.

This is troublesome, because amnesty is a bad idea both as policy and as politics. Amnesty—the granting of formal legal status to those who live here illegally and are therefore subject to deportation—is being pushed by those who stand to benefit the most from it, chiefly immigrant advocates, unions and the administration of Mexican President Vicente Fox.

Democratic leaders in Congress are also enthusiastic about some sort of legalization program. Yet to many illegal aliens, amnesty offers less than meets the eye.

And to Americans anxious about the illegal influx into the country, it is more like a poke in the eye. But even that program is likely to contain terms that will allow for the eventual legalization of some of the undocumented workers now in the country. And even though the degree of compassion in amnesty is greatly exaggerated and its political benefit to Bush steadily shrinking, the White House will find it all but impossible to abandon the idea of amnesty now that it has been put on the table.

Amnesty may seem, on the surface, to be a reasonable measure, but what specific problems facing illegals does it redress? Research has shown that undocumented immigrants get paid less than other workers. In fact, there is a considerable body of research indicating that the well-being of immigrants is less a function of their legal status than of the length of time they have been in the United States.

The problems that beset undocumented immigrants diminish as they cease to become transients whether moving around in the U. And of course, the more time illegals spend here, the more adept they become at avoiding the INS.

Estimated sales and excise tax paid by illegal immigrants in the United States in Estimated property tax paid by illegal immigrants in the United States in Estimated personal income tax paid by illegal immigrants in the United States in Public opinion on illegal immigration Percentage of Americans who viewed building a wall on the Mexico border as very important in Percentage of Americans who viewed increased deportation of unauthorized immigrants as very important in Percentage of Americans who thought illegal immigrants should be able to stay in the country after meeting certain criteria.

Interesting statistics In the following 4 chapters, you will quickly find the 20 most important statistics relating to "Illegal immigration in the United States". Statistics on the topic. Overview Unauthorized immigrant population U. Illegal immigrants in the U. Public opinion on the level of immigration into the U. Share of adults believing immigrants strengthen the country, by generation U.

Public opinion on a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants U. More interesting topics Related topics. United States. Just a tiny handful of American cities have a lower homicide rate and most of those that do San Diego, Chula Vista, and Mesa, AZ, for example also have outsize Mexican populations.

Incredibly El Paso's homicide rate is so low that it compares favorably to European capitals like London, Paris and Amsterdam, cities which have rates of lethal violence that are generally an order of magnitude lower than cities in the United States.

To summarize, while it is right for Americans to be concerned about the equality of the immigrants we attract, there is simply no evidence to support that Mexican immigration should be a cause for concern. If anything, there is quite a bit of evidence that the immigrants we attract from Mexico serve to make us safer than we otherwise would be. Butcher, Kristin f. Chaflin, Aaron MacDonald, John and Jessica Saunders Skip to main content.

Search form Search. Do Mexican Immigrants "Cause" Crime?