What is the difference between kde and xfce

As shown in the screenshot above, MATE is essentially a return to the much loved desktop found in older versions of Linux. You can click here to see a list of KDE applications [2]. Following are a few applications and components of KDE:. Video Player: Dragon Player. This mode with its large icons and search can be used with a touchscreen, and is great for smaller devices such as netbooks and tablets. Media Player: Parole. Task Manager: Xfce Task Manager. Additionally, it will run extremely fast on newer computers.

Even with its super-efficiency, LXDE is still a nice and feature-rich desktop environment that has menus which are simple and straightforward and very easy to navigate. In its default appearance LXDE resembles older versions of Windows such as Windows 98 or , with a single panel at the bottom of the desktop and a menu found on the left side of that panel, but like GNOME 2. Enlightenment Though Enlightenment a. Widget Toolkit: Elementary. Recommended System Requirements for Enlightenment E17 to be fully functional on a netbook, laptop, or desktop.

A relative new-comer to the world of desktop environments for Linux, Razor-qt is still very much in its fledgling stages. At this point, Razor-qt does not yet have its own file manager or other applications other than a clock widget , but perhaps it will have more applications in the future. Overall, it is a clean interface, which to me is reminiscent of older versions of KDE. Pictured above is Razor-qt running in Lubuntu At this point, there are not any recommended system requirements for Razor-qt that I can find, but based on my own tests, it appears that the system requirements for Razor-qt should probably be something similar to Xfce.

So the Recommended System Requirements below are the same as those for Xfce. Window managers are, as the term suggests, simply used to manage the opening and closing of programs in a graphical, point-and-click windowed desktop.

Window managers can be used as a component of a desktop environment, or they can run on their own. Unity is a nice 3D desktop environment designed for good performance on recent hardware. In KDE is an alternative lighter weight desktop environment to Ubuntu's default interface.

Many other Linux distros offer Xfce versions as well. It will also run extremely fast on newer computers. Even with its super-efficiency, LXDE is still a nice and feature-rich desktop environment that has menus which are simple and straightforward and very easy to navigate.

In its default appearance, LXDE resembles older versions of Windows such as Windows 98 or , with a single panel at the bottom of the desktop and a menu found on the left side of that panel.

Popular Window Managers in Linux:. Window managers are, as the term suggests, simply used to manage the opening and closing of programs in a graphical, point-and-click windowed desktop. Window managers can be used as a component of a desktop environment, or they can run on their own. Enlightenment - Though Enlightenment E17 is a window manager, it can also be considered a "desktop shell," and the project has grown to encompass a number of applications and libraries which are together known as EFL.

Because of its many features, many people even consider Enlightenment a. One very nice feature of Enlightenment is its flexibility, which among other things, allows it to run on a wide variety of devices that includes mobile phones, game systems, laptops, and powerful desktop computers. It also offers a lot of "eye candy," which is amazing, given its very small footprint.

The Enlightenment desktop is somewhat unique in its appearance, and users can simply click anywhere on it to access the menu. Bodhi Linux is a popular distro that uses Enlightenment as its default desktop. Recommended System Requirements for Enlightenment E17 to be fully functional on a netbook, laptop, or desktop:. Below are the results of an "unscientific" test I conducted with various desktop environments and window managers. Do you have a solution in KDE? This is important because I have been using SL Gnome just for this.

I realize that in the end it was not a question. Finally, taking into account my work, do you recommend SL or Slackware? Clearly it was very technical and there are few engineers or scientists around here. Thanks anyway because some things you write help a lot. I read it almost daily. I prefer LXDE and that of "less powerful" is in a way a bit harsh for an environment that has in my modest opinion one of the lightest file handlers that I have seen, such as PCManFM, but hey.

It does not seem less powerful to me, since with it you can do the same things as in other environments, and with less consumption, for example that is why I love Lubuntu, it has a very good visual theme and consumes very little. In any case, I would say that it is less intuitive for first-time users than the other environments, especially in the aspect of configuring LXDE, which is where it limps a bit Yes, of course you can do things that are normal with other environments, but they are simple and very basic tasks.

Let's see, I'll make it simple for you. When I refer to powerful, I do it based on the productivity facilities that the tool offers you. For example, answer these simple questions:. You don't really have to answer me because I know the answer. I myself have to admit that no matter how much I like Xfce, it will never have half the options that KDE has, which with its tools make it the most productive and powerful Desktop that exists.

But it is that productivity is according to your concept of productivity, which does not mean that you are wrong, but for me something productive is an application that allows me to do a certain action quickly and easily, for you that PCManFM has a filter bar content or search or a terminal are functions, for me they are an extra, functions that are made by other programs specially designed for them, such as the terminal, or a search box which is true that it is something that LXDE by default lacks moment or filtering, apart, are things that you can add with two clicks, or that as I said, other programs created for it can do.

For example, why are you going to edit a photo from Word, being able to edit it from Photoshop, which was created for it? Besides, LXDE was created looking for a light and simple desktop, which is equivalent to fewer functions or less complete or concise functions, so if someone wants to be productive, they do not choose LXDE because it was not created for that. Besides, if you want to be productive in a job in a company, you will most likely have to use Windows with its office programs and suites, as well as other programs created for this or that activity or function, unless you have to use Windows at work.

LXDE is not less powerful, it is, at best, less productive than other desktop environments, but I think that power is not only associated with the degree of productivity, but also with more things, such as usability, accessibility, the visual aspect But it is that productivity is according to your concept of productivity, which does not mean that you are wrong, but for me something productive is an application that allows me to do a certain action quickly and easily, for you that PCManFM has a filter bar content or search or a terminal are functions.

Exactly, functions that make working with files, archives, folders much easier. Let's say you open PCManFM, you go to a folder that has a thousand PDF documents, you start typing its name and what you type has to match the original name. With the Dolphin filter, as you write, the rest of the documents disappear, leaving only the coincidences What do you think is faster and more productive? To begin with, Windows Explorer is disgusting, a mess, all the elements are displayed in a confusing way, it is not intuitive, it does not have extra tabs or panels.

Let's see, if you take only that part of the paragraph, it either lacks sense, or coincides with what you think, but the other part is the mainstay of my argument, they are functions, yes, but extra functions, it is not something that I have to Having PCManFM has to have yes or yes, if those functions that you say help you to be more productive, well great, but if it is known that they affect performance, and LXDE is to be light and simple, not productive, or not As well as other environments, many times there are simple, light and productive programs and other times there are not, because it is difficult to find a perfect balance between something light which usually has fewer functions, options or features and something productive.

Nor have I said that Windows is the same or the best in productivity, but that it is usually the most used in companies to work, which does not mean that being the most used, it is the most productive.

If you are right, Windows Explorer It sucks, but it is the most used, which does not mean that it is the most productive. I really liked this article, and looking at your website if I see a bug, you see very little who the author is, that is, that tiny little box at the end you should keep it, but put somewhere else who wrote it, I for example would also put it next to the reading counter.

About the article itself, KDE is now the best and most complete option, although I would like it to improve some of the KDE applications, I don't like anything, for example, the Dragon Player, or VLC, and the truth is, I find few alternatives good as video players in Qt, Bangarang does not attract much attention to me either.. Thanks for the suggestion. In fact, we had already thought about putting the author at the top.. Bangarang is not a bad video player, but it is a terrible player and organizer of music libraries, and that's why I don't want it, I pass duplicate programs, if Amarok already does the function of playing music very well, why should I have another player What reproduces it for me, but what organizes it for me wrong?

Thanks also for those who have put, although my smplayer I do not like very much for the interface, it is like VLC, ugly and somewhat overloaded with options. You can try kaffeine, umplayer, kmplayer, playbak, bakaar, loopy, they are all pretty simple kde video players. I would highlight its total integration with KDE, its subtitle manager It even downloads them as well as that the reproduction of a video continues where I left it Not existing in VLC.

I have tried cinnamon, I use unity, I use gnome shell, I like it but I don't know how to configure it to make it more beautiful. It is true. This is told to you by someone who doesn't like the look and feel of KDE by default, but like Xfce, KDE can be customized to your liking and even give it the appearance of any other desktop environment. And LXDE too. It does not have so many graphical tools to do it, but it can be customized, it can, and a lot. But you spend a little more work, I think..

There are things that you have to put by hand in the. Yes, it is true that configuring text files takes more time than if it is done with graphic tools. Now, as I am not one of those who likes to have a different desktop every week, the configuration process is done practically only once, at the time of installation.

Then, when it is to my liking, I forget to personalize the desktop at most a change of wallpaper. Also, when I notice how fast LXDE works compared to other environments, I am not sorry to have to go through a somewhat more complex configuration, because the agility of the environment pays for any other obstacles it may have It is true that KDE is much more complete but as it is super complete it is also super heavy although they have managed to give it some lightness since version 4.

I hope that now with the purchase of Digia from Qt the KDE path is kept on the right track because it is very fucking that now after so much walking they have to start from scratch in case the owners take a bad path.

If you knew. Right now I'm using KDE on my work netbook. And you know what? KDE consumes me almost the same sometimes less, other times more than Xfce, and much, much less than Gnome What do you think? Do you have any idea what the reason for this high CPU consumption may be? Try using the system monitor and ordering from top to bottom in cpu to see what consumes the most, you can also try disabling nepomuk or akonadi.

To consume less cpu you can go to the appearance of the applications, style, fine adjustment and in graphic effect select little cpu. Sometimes it freezes from the use of some 3rd party tmb plasmoid. I really like LXDE, the few resources it consumes are incredible and for me it has several facilities, F4 to access the terminal from any folder, bookmarks, just by typing I can search for the file inside the folder I am in, etc.

I still admit that it is not for the novice user and that not everyone may like the simplicity of LXDE. For those who like minimalist desktops, I show you a screenshot of my KDE from mageia 1 when I had it on my pc:. Taking advantage of the previous comment, my humble suggestions to the design of the web, which I love:. Shortening URLs is very good, you have to see if alaintm who programs the theme has time now to do it, because this is an implementation that was not in the plans and he has other things to do hahahaha.

I use KDE on Mageia 2, I am very happy with it, although it is true that sometimes so many and somewhat scattered options confuse it, but I stick with it just because of its configuration options. I would also like to read about other options, right now I am thinking of incorporating Enlightenment, which although in a certain way is not that advanced, lately they are working very hard, it is also very configurable except the menu.

And that you suggest other environments, I have heard of Openbox and derivatives, but of these I have not seen many things in themselves. I almost have to thank Ubuntu for putting Unity and making me look for another distro, because since I installed Xubuntu I am delighted, my laptop seems different, it is luxurious.

The only downside for my taste is that the appearance of the main panel I liked the Gnome Classic much more in Ubuntu. For the rest, yes, Thunar may lack a little but for me I have plenty. I think that neither is more powerful than the other, as the author indicated, it is a matter of taste and objectives, goals.

There will always be these kinds of debates, not just with desktop environments, operating systems, novels, chewing gum, keyboards, iPhones, PCs, etc. For me the most complete and attractive is KDE but I don't use it since so many options make me dizzy. I like the light desk and what I need at hand, with which I use Xfce which I love. I also use Gnome 2 from SolusOs and now I am testing xlde which is not bad at all, and it also meets what I need.

Unity, Cinnamon and Gnome in my opinion are not very practical and come by sight, before I would use KDE because it is attractive and more practical, which is not the case. I love it. Gnome 2 fork hopefully long life. For now KDE is the best desktop for me, its progress has been remarkable both in stability and speed, and it is very complete and configurable.

I was also one of the Gnome escapes in its current version, first because of its impractical interface for a normal pc, its few almost nil configuration options, in addition to that most of the themes are not to my liking, also adding the problem extensions that become incompatible with the passing of the versions, apart from consuming more resources than KDE.

Nor is it necessary to deny that there are very good Gnome applications, in my case I prefer to use the Gnome multimedia applications than the KDE ones. The same everyone uses what seems best to him and suits his needs, and mine is amply filled by KDE as a desktop environment. Lately I am using two alternatives that have not been mentioned here, razor-qt and elementary pantheon shell.

A razor which is not a desktop environment I use it as a kind of kde without kwin I use openbox and without plasma. It works very well it is more stable than plasma as it is simpler and it consumes little it consumes less than MB with several kde processes started. Pantheon is a gnome shell if I'm not mistaken, it uses gala as a window manager, files as a file browser, plank as a dock, and various other programs created by the elementary team.

For me it is simply great, the most comfortable and elegant default environment that I have found to date in addition to being quite stable even if it is in alpha or beta , that if, it does not have many customization options. It lacks some tools for example, in a netbook there is not something to visualize the battery level, or at least I have not found it , but in general it seems to me that it has a future, although lately I have not seen news of this project. As for pantheon, I don't usually use Gnome Shells actively for some strange reason, however the elementary project has always been concerned about offering a certain level of quality in its applications, so I suppose that the stable version will give a lot to talk about.

Regarding the article, I have tried mentioned desktops and it is curious to me that Gnome 3 has provoked so many Shells and philosophies of use with the same base.

I remember when they announced that version 2. In my opinion the change was not so abrupt, but rather somewhat annoying, especially with the absence of some functionalities, although as I repeat, I did not use it actively so my opinion is very debatable. Finally, answering the question in the post, KDE is my preferred desktop, for many reasons and although there are things that I don't like such as the behavior of notifications under certain circumstances , there are always alternatives or a developer to communicate with.

Greetings all. Sorry Vicky, but could you comment which distro you use and some info on how to install Pantheon Shell? It's not for nothing, I've been using Enlightenment or E17 for a long time and it works great for me. KDE has spectacular applications, like the powerful K3B, I have simply installed them and they work wonderfully with their great power but without losing the speed I need.

The truth is that I have nothing to envy the greats, they give me the programs I need, making, together with E17, the best environment I have ever had, fast and extremely configurable. Too bad it is left out. Give it a try, it is true that it is very different at first, but it is worth taking a few minutes to configure it. Thank you if you have read all this comment. I can't talk much about E17 because I've tried it very, very little..

Could you comment a little more about your experience with E??? Just starting with Mageia, I migrate from coming using Debian and derivatives and I am going to install E Good post. I am very fond of KDE for the same reasons you mention especially beauty , but because of the way it hurts performance I always ended up abandoning it the last time I used it was with debian, which I think is the distro more stable, but even debian KDE ended up getting heavy.

I recently gave Linux Mint a chance again, with Cinnamon, but again, although it is not a big deal, that loss of performance due to resource consumption ends up making me sick. But before discarding Mint, this time I decided to try XFCE a couple of years ago I used it in Xubuntu, on that occasion I suffered with a bug in Thunar that hung my computer , and the truth is I was delighted with the performance of my computer.

By habit and because there are programs that do not satisfy me in Linux or because there are no equivalent options I always use Windows 7. Perhaps for you this is nonsense: I am very bad used to listening to music with a plugin called "Enhancer 0.

Meanwhile, I listen to music with Aimp through Wine A while ago I did not feel so comfortable, happy and satisfied using linux. I was very happy to know that debian decided on XFCE, that combination will make the computers very powerful I will surely return to debian. You cannot say that Gnome with its Shell is a bad application far from it. Nor would I like to criticize Gnome so much, but it is true, I do not understand why it is less and less customizable? It is that consumption should be greater when eating more resources, at least in my arch kde I was shot at mb of base consumption, I mean with nothing running, and with it the battery lasted around hrs, now I haven't tried KDE on debian, I'll see if I'll get down to work over the weekend and I'll tell you later how I'm doing with my team, greetings Ariki.